The table below gives information about a restaurant’s average sales in three different branches in 2016.
The table illustrates the comparison of the average sales between three different restaurants in 2016. Overall, the first rank in all of transaction categories, such as number of transactions, transaction value, number of eat-in transactions, as well as number of take-away transactions is Vancouver Georgia street.
On the other hand, Vancouver dunsmuir street was positioned as the second rank three categories of transactions, albeit it is the lowest in the average of transaction value which it just gained less than $6. In contrast, Vancouver drake street was assigned as the nethermost rank in the number of transactions, Eat-In transactions, and Take-Away transactions which the average of them reached 390, 200, and 190 respectively, albeit the transaction value of Vancouver drake street had successful gained more than $9.
Finally, there are the different most popular item in each branches. chicken burger is the most popular menu in Vancouver Georgia street, chicken wings in Vancouver dunsmuir street, as well as chicken pasta in vancouver drake street.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 204, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ion value which it just gained less than . In contrast, Vancouver drake street was...
^^
Line 3, column 510, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...e street had successful gained more than . Finally, there are the different mos...
^^
Line 5, column 47, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'items'?
Suggestion: items
...y, there are the different most popular item in each branches. chicken burger is the...
^^^^
Line 5, column 70, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Chicken
...ent most popular item in each branches. chicken burger is the most popular menu in Vanc...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, second, so, well, in contrast, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 906.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59259259259 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10674172412 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 79.0 106.607317073 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.487654320988 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.5263396101 43.030603864 180% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.0 112.824112599 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.8333333333 5.23603664747 283% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103108671872 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0983293212286 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.158510152918 0.0843802449381 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0804891908073 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0681532479565 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.2329268293 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 61.2550243902 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 11.4140731707 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.