The table below shows the production of milk annually in four countries in 1990,
2000 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the man features
and make comparisons where relevant.
The rendered tabular chart compares the yearly production of milk in the Netherland,Austraila,Tanzania,Guatemala over three years 1990,2000,2010.
Overall, it is clear that the production of milk increased in all given countries expect for Australia.Netherland experienced a maximum milk production while, minimum production of milk witnessed in Guatemala.
In the fleeting glance it is immensely clear that,Netherland accounted for 11,262,000 and 11,155,000 of milk production in the first two years respectively,subsequently to which the number rose upto 11,466,000 litter in 2010.In contrast, the respective figure for Guatemala in the years 1990,2000,2010 were recorded to be 26,000,55,000 and 84,000 litter. Which happened to be the least.
Probing further, as regard Tabzanai the production of milk witnessed a growth from 87,000 litter in 1990 to 1,42,000 litter in 2000,following they reached to 1,55,000 litter in the end of period.As for as Australia was concerned there was decreasing to 11,105,00 litter in 2000 and the milk production again dwindled to 9,165,000 litter in the year 2010.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 84, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Austraila
...rly production of milk in the Netherland,Austraila,Tanzania,Guatemala over three years 199...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 103, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Guatemala
...ilk in the Netherland,Austraila,Tanzania,Guatemala over three years 1990,2000,2010. O...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 104, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Netherland
...ll given countries expect for Australia.Netherland experienced a maximum milk production w...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 50, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Netherland
...eeting glance it is immensely clear that,Netherland accounted for 11,262,000 and 11,155,000...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 156, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , subsequently
...tion in the first two years respectively,subsequently to which the number rose upto 11,466,00...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 226, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...ber rose upto 11,466,000 litter in 2010.In contrast, the respective figure for Gua...
^^
Line 9, column 274, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ast, the respective figure for Guatemala in the years 1990,2000,2010 were record...
^^
Line 9, column 278, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the respective figure for Guatemala in the years 1990,2000,2010 were recorded t...
^^
Line 9, column 358, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... to be 26,000,55,000 and 84,000 litter. Which happened to be the least. Probing ...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 69, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...abzanai the production of milk witnessed a growth from 87,000 litter in 1990 to ...
^^
Line 13, column 91, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of milk witnessed a growth from 87,000 litter in 1990 to 1,42,000 litter in 200...
^^
Line 13, column 149, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o 1,42,000 litter in 2000,following they reached to 1,55,000 litter in the end of...
^^
Line 13, column 199, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: As
...to 1,55,000 litter in the end of period.As for as Australia was concerned there wa...
^^
Line 13, column 242, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...for as Australia was concerned there was decreasing to 11,105,00 litter in 2000 a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, while, as for, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 954.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.88888888889 4.92477711251 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 4.4941663147 2.65546596893 169% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58024691358 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 125.703460573 43.030603864 292% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 190.8 112.824112599 169% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.4 22.9334400587 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 14.0 1.69756097561 825% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157974176506 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0974198896825 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573738884021 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121000377747 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349875675655 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.5 13.2329268293 170% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.47 11.4140731707 153% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.4329268293 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.