According to the chart below reveals the proportion of dissimilarity group of families staying in poverty in Australia in 1999.
General overview here shows that age couple family type is living less under poverty than sole parents type family. In Australia in 1999, 11 percent peoples were struggling in poverty.
To begin with, the table exactly described that mostly sole parents of family are living under poverty. It's around 21%. Which in number 2,32,000 peoples. As well as only 4% aged couple are less struggling with short of money. However, single with no children and couple with children are also living in poverty significantly. It's around approximately 3.5 millions and 2 millions respectively. In addition, 6 percentage single aged persons and 7 percentage couple without children are living much better than other types of family in Australia in 1999.
Overall, in 1999 in Australia 1,837,000 peoples are living under poverty markedly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 400, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...illions and 2 millions respectively. In addition 6 percentage single aged person and 7 p...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 434, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'person' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'people', 'persons'.
Suggestion: people; persons
...y. In addition 6 percentage single aged person and 7 percentage couple without childre...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 458, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'couple' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'couples'.
Suggestion: couples
...age single aged person and 7 percentage couple without children are living much better...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, well, in addition, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 805.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29605263158 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6678341382 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585526315789 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.0325145242 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.1818181818 112.824112599 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.8181818182 22.9334400587 60% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.09090909091 5.23603664747 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215111007542 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0792430441527 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0743072441283 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163522235277 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477071174876 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.19 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.