The table compares the outcomes of surveys in three different years 2005, 2010 and 2015 about the percentage of students giving good rating scores for various aspects of McGill University.
Overall, in the table we can clearly see that the percentage of students have given a highest ratings in library resources in three different kind of periods, whereas, the lowest percentage is witnessed in range of modules offered. However, in the other aspects have average percentages.
Firstly, library resources play a major role in McGill University that's why students have excellent rating in it which were 86, 88 and 87 percentage in 2005, 2010 and 2015 respectively. Moreover, Teaching quality has 2nd highest rating in the table and the percentages was countable 74%, 72%and 78% in three various years 2005, 2010 and 2015 respectively.
Secondly, the other aspects such as student’s services and sports and social facilities has average rating in McGill University. But in 2015 the rating was highest record in among all the list of table which was 95%. Despite, sports and social facilities has same rating in three different year 65%, while, students given the least rating in range of modules offered which was 39% and 31% in 2005 and 2010 and in 2015 it was decreased and the rating was 25 percent.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 85, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...t the percentage of students have given a highest ratings in library resources in...
^
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'kind' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'kinds'.
Suggestion: kinds
...in library resources in three different kind of periods, whereas, the lowest percent...
^^^^
Line 5, column 67, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
... play a major role in McGill University thats why students have excellent rating in i...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 153, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'was the highest'.
Suggestion: was the highest
...Gill University. But in 2015 the rating was highest record in among all the list of table w...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, whereas, while, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1099.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08796296296 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60064473778 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486111111111 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 310.5 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.7573451876 43.030603864 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.375 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.25 5.23603664747 234% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132961442157 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0670519313403 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627428675675 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102967344134 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0690022040365 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.