The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US, EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010
The table illustrates a number of money, which were given to undeveloped countries by different organizations in various nations. It depicts changes during the period of 4 years.
Overall, the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries have risen by 2010. While all trends were relatively similar between the main changes, there was some variance, especially in billions of US dollars given by the United States of America, that has always a rise tendency, whereas others have also slightly decreased trajectories.
The totaly number of money, that was given by European countries had been slightly increased by 2008 and then after a steadily decrease, rose up to 4.0 billions of dollars in 2010. For other countries, the trajectory was more different, rising gently in the first part of the period and then reaching the lowest point in 2009 at close at 2.6 billions of money after which it grow by 0.7 billions.
The number of the USA money engaged in aid of technology of developing countries over the period soared from approximately 9.7 to 22.7 billions by 2010; meanwhile the total number also steadily increased from nearly 15.7 in 2006 to well above 30 billions in 2010.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 23, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[5]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun money seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much money', 'a good deal of money'.
Suggestion: much money; a good deal of money
The table illustrates a number of money, which were given to undeveloped countr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 117, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('steadily') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decrease') instead of another adjective.
...ightly increased by 2008 and then after a steadily decrease, rose up to 4.0 billions of dollars in ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 151, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '0 billion'.
Suggestion: 0 billion
...after a steadily decrease, rose up to 4.0 billions of dollars in 2010. For other countries, t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 341, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '6 billion'.
Suggestion: 6 billion
... the lowest point in 2009 at close at 2.6 billions of money after which it grow by 0.7 billio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 376, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'grows'?
Suggestion: grows
...at 2.6 billions of money after which it grow by 0.7 billions. The number of the...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, then, well, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1016.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05472636816 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70503144509 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577114427861 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.7094338068 43.030603864 176% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.142857143 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7142857143 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356051653257 0.215688989381 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169589131355 0.103423049105 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147691545574 0.0843802449381 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206528099551 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0661802047719 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.