The table shows the percentage of people with mobile phones who use various features on their phone
The table presents the proportion of people owning mobile phones that have various functions. Overall, it is evident that making calls was a popular feature on mobile phones which almost people used over three different years.
It can be seen from the table that making calls function was used by all people owning mobile phones in 2006 and 2008 and this feature slightly decreased in 2010. The second most common feature was sending and receiving text messages increasing from 73 percent in 2006 to 79 percent in 2010. Similarly, the percentage of people using taking photos function also rose by 10 percent throughout that period.
Conversely, playing games, searching the Internet, playing music and recording videos features was used by just under 50 percent of all users. Searching the Internet and recording videos functions did not have data which was given for 2006, but there was a significant increase in the number of people using from 2008 to 2010. While, playing games and music features also gradually grew over a period of 4 years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eople used over three different years. It can be seen from the table that makin...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... by 10 percent throughout that period. Conversely, playing games, searching the...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, if, second, similarly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 883.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07471264368 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36958002593 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574712643678 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.0279611802 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.375 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283578475397 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141834142305 0.103423049105 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10860089622 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226333365743 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123279916547 0.0819641961636 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.