The tables below give information about sales of Fair-trade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
The tables illustrate how much Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas five European countries sold in 1999 and 2004. Overall, it is clear that sales of coffee in all the sampled places experienced an increase during the five years, and so did those of bananas in the majority of countries except Sweden and Denmark.
Starting with the first table, the sales of coffee in the UK showed an obvious increase from 1.5 million euros in 1999 to 20 million euros in 2004. Meanwhile, those of coffee in Switzerland were doubled from 3 million euros to 6 million euros.The figures for both Denmark and Sweden rose by the same million euros(0.2), from 1.8 to 2 and from 0.8 to 1 respectively. Even if the figures for the five countries ranged from 0.8 million euros to 3 million euros in 1999, the sales in the UK was apparently much higher than those in any other state.
Turning now to the second chart, the sales of bananas in Switzerland rose the most significantly from 15 million euros in 1999 to 47 million euros in 2004, always the largest number among the five countries in 2004. The five years also witnessed a moderate rise in the UK (from 1 to 5.5 million euros) and Belgium (from 0.6 to 4 million euros). However, the sales of bananas experienced a decrease in Sweden (1.8—2 million euros) and Denmark (2—0.9 million euros.)
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 243, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...from 3 million euros to 6 million euros.The figures for both Denmark and Sweden ros...
^^^
Line 2, column 543, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h higher than those in any other state. Turning now to the second chart, the sal...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, first, however, if, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1093.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69098712446 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6253047336 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.472103004292 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.956226048 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.625 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.125 22.9334400587 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188441012721 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121161144058 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102551915064 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171158688555 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0933275409511 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.