The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1997 and 2004 in five European countries.
The tables below compare amount of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas ‘sales in five countries in two different years include of 1999 and 2004.
The first table displays information about consumption of coffee in five countries namely, UK, Switzerland, Denmark, Belgium and Sweden while the other one shows the bananas were sold in the mentioned countries in 1999 and 2004.
According to the first table, in comparison to other countries, UK experienced a sharp increase in sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee in 2004 when Sweden and Denmark both, together have enjoyed a slight increase which can give a good clue about these market to the relevance investor.
The data provided by second table express clearly that Switzerland in both identified years was the best market for bananas in regard to other, also, it should be noted that its consumption in this country increased sharply whereas other countries such as UK and Belgium have an increase in 2004 in compare of 1999 but not as sharp as Switzerland. Along with this, the two remained countries exceptionally had an imperceptible decrease in an amount of bananas were sold in 2004 in regard to 1999.
To wrap it up, in my personal viewpoint, Sweden and Denmark had not good market for Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in both years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The tables below compare amount of Fairt...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, whereas, while, such as, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1114.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23004694836 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06864171412 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535211267606 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 323.1 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 22.4926829268 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.7160861719 43.030603864 183% => OK
Chars per sentence: 185.666666667 112.824112599 165% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.5 22.9334400587 155% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8333333333 5.23603664747 226% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31076969977 0.215688989381 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169318171336 0.103423049105 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0935176718918 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194167873008 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0829521510365 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.0 13.2329268293 159% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.41 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.3012195122 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.65 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.9970731707 145% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.