The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given pie charts illustrate shifts in money spending every year by a school in the UK in three different years when comparing five sectors, namely Insurance, Teacher’s salaries, Furniture and equipment, Resources and Other workers’ salaries.
It is clear that Teacher’s salaries accounted for the largest proportion of the school’s total spending. By contrast, the percentages of money invested in Insurance were the lowest figures in the charts.
In 1981, the figure for Teacher’s salaries was 40%, representing the major spending in this year. There was a slight increase in this sector in 1991, at 50%, before falling back to 45% in 2001. It is noticeable that spending on Insurance made up a little bit proportion in 1981 (2%), however, this figure rose dramatically to 8% in 2001.
Of the five different sectors, Other workers’ salaries constituted a quite stable percentage of total spending. The UK school was seemed to spend less money in Furniture and equipment from 1981 to 1991, but there was a significant increase in this budget from 1991 to 2001, at 5% and 23% respectively.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 253, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...le that spending on Insurance made up a little bit proportion in 1981 2%, however, this fi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 207, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rniture and equipment from 1981 to 1991, but there was a significant increase in ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 948.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26666666667 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15698324511 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577777777778 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6793068956 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.5 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151178382729 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0635471439147 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513299416721 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0923672123229 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412274119706 0.0819641961636 50% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.