the three pie chart below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The three pie charts illustrate altration in the amount of annual spending, which is measured in precentagw of total spending per year, during different three years (1981, 1991 and 2001), particularly in UK school.
Overall, it can be noticed that teatchers’ salaries occupied the highest porportion over the given years, while the element of furniture and equipment saw a sudden rise in spending proportion by 2001.
Initially, by 1981, there was 40% of total spending of teachers’ salaries, whereas the other 60% was divided into furniture and equipment, resources e.g. books, other workers’ salaries and insurance with 15%, 15%, 28% and 2% respectively.
By 1991, it saw a slight increase in proportion of teachers’ salaries to 50%, which then decreased to 45% by 2001. Although UK school decreased the spending proportion of furniture and equipments to 5% in 1991, but it peaked to 23% in the following two years. Moreover, the insurance spending rate, which was 3% in 1991, jumped over double reaching 8% in contrast, there was two remaining items that droped down dramatically (resources e.g. books and other worker’s salaries) from 1991 (42%) to 2001 (24%)
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, e.g., if, moreover, so, then, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1002.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32978723404 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04112077574 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601063829787 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.2620163506 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 167.0 112.824112599 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.3333333333 22.9334400587 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 5.23603664747 197% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194536731705 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106610091389 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0911238087671 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126492116384 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106157867264 0.0819641961636 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.3 13.2329268293 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.23 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.