The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981,1991 and 2001.
The pie graphs compare the difference of financial invests in some areas of a British school in 1981,1991 and 2001. It is clear that the money paid for teacher’s salaries ranked first in these three years, which were about 50% of the total spending.
In the year of 1991, it saw a slight decrease in expenditure of furniture and equipment from 15% in 1981 to 5%, which followed by an increase of 18% in the year of 2001. however, there was an opposite trend in the change of the money spent on the necessary resources like books, which went up a little from 15% in 1981 to 20% in 1991, then undergone a dropping to 9%.
The spending of insurance in the school remained stably during the three years’ time, although it rise to 8% compared to the percentage of 1981(3%). However, the trend of the portion of salaries paid for other employees was opposite with that of insurance, which undergone a stable decrease from 28% to 9%.
In sum, the expenditure of hiring tutors took the biggest part of the total spending(almost 50%), which had experienced only a slight change. By contrast, the fee of insuring took up a minor portion,which was under 10%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 171, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...an increase of 18% in the year of 2001. however, there was an opposite trend in the cha...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 99, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'rises'?
Suggestion: rises
...ring the three years’ time, although it rise to 8% compared to the percentage of 198...
^^^^
Line 7, column 197, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , which
... fee of insuring took up a minor portion,which was under 10%.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 952.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64390243902 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63536557149 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556097560976 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5910609389 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.625 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161235999335 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0718897565981 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753438649001 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0940273058775 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0644489785653 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.