trends i usgae of internet by women i usa
The bar chart and the line graph illustrates the trend of internet usage by the females in the age group of 12 to over 65 years in the USA during 2000 and 2001.
Overall, a decreasing trend was observed in the usage of internet with an increase in age.
To begin with, it is clearly evident from the graph that in 2001, the young girls used the internet to an extent of just above 90% and it began to decline gradually to reach an internet usage approximately 68% by 36-45 years aged women. The utilization of the internet was maintained at an almost constant rate in case of 46 to 55 year old women. After that, it further reduced to reach a lowest point of 20% usage by old women with 65 and above 65 years old.
In 2001, a trend similar to 2001 was observed with net usage starting at 90% by young girls, which then raised to 100% in teenage girls. The trend kept decreasing to attain just below 80% usage by 46 to 55 year old women. It then plummeted to reach a lowest peak of 30% by the old women of 65 and above 65 years old.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 388, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...After that, it further reduced to reach a lowest point of 20% usage by old women ...
^
Line 13, column 251, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...r old women. It then plummeted to reach a lowest peak of 30% by the old women of ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
then, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 846.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.20895522388 4.92477711251 85% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.19353905229 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.482587064677 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3073395468 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.75 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.125 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.375 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233070403188 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116201539149 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515776210062 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159158672888 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237594261783 0.0819641961636 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.94 61.2550243902 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.43 11.4140731707 65% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.08 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.