The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given two drawing illustrates how the island changed before and after developing for tourist facilities.

To begin with, before development for island which is approximately over 250m, there were 3 trees in the west side and there were also numerous trees in the east side.

On the other hand, after progressing for the island, plenty of buildings appeared in the island. Firstly, pier was built in south side of the island. Also reception building was constructed around vehicle track in the middle of the island. Besides, restaurant which is the biggest building in the island appeared in north side. In addition, there were a number of accommodations in west side and east side. It existed 6 accommodations around 3 trees in west side and 9 accommodations in east side next to numerous trees. Through the footpath to east side, island had beach for swimming.

In conclusion, this development brought a lot of change for island. Consequently, the island got crowded, compared with previous island.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 151, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... was built in south side of the island. Also reception building was constructed arou...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, consequently, first, firstly, so, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 848.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13939393939 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87967450461 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.2324329157 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.0909090909 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0 22.9334400587 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.90909090909 5.23603664747 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125191858443 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0617598249191 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582836789496 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103997784367 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0680918558426 0.0819641961636 83% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.94 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.