You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The diagrams below show the design for a wave-energy machine and its location.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.You should write at lea

Essay topics:

You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.

The diagrams below show the design for a wave-energy machine and its location.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

You should write at least 150 words.

The above chart illustrates how a machine generates electricity from wave and the options of location where the machines should be installed to induce maximal and minimal amount of energy.

Regarding the process of electricity manufacture, wave movements accelerate water levels contained in the ground chamber, which triggers air pressure to flow up, accordingly making the first turbine spin. Simultaneously, the other source of air from the top of the machine also flows down, activating the second turbine. The air in and out continuously occurs in the chambers in order for the unstoppable operation of the two turbines. Apparently, the stronger wave movements are, the greater air pressure is created, which definitely yields more significant amount of electricity.

The below image clearly demonstrates the possible locations for setting up the electricity generating machines as well as their cost estimations. Smaller machines that consume a handful of money in installation are suggested to be situated near the coast where low levels of ocean water are stored. As a result, insignificant amount of electricity would be generated. In contrast, the huge machines whose water containers are spacious should be located in deep water areas and far away from the coastal line.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (3 votes)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, first, if, regarding, second, so, well, in contrast, as a result, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1091.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4824120603 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00320948158 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618090452261 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 352.8 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1015537093 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.222222222 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8888888889 5.23603664747 227% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107784449247 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.043135828584 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.032162605622 0.0843802449381 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0813175899165 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288903084256 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 61.2550243902 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.4329268293 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.