The company you work for has decided to close the cafeteria as staff are not using it much. You are unhappy about it. Write a letter to the supervisor / director (someone in authority)
- Asking not to close it
- Inform what feel is the cause of staff not using it.
- How can things be improved in the cafeteria.
Dear Sir/Madam,
I am A T M Jakir Alam, an employee of Orion Infusion Limited, who is working as a product executive under marketing department. I am writing to request you on half of the employees of our company not to close the cafeteria located on the top floor which has been serving us since the inception of the company.
Undeniably, the cafeteria is a blessing for the workers of the company thanks to the reasonable price of the food items. However, due to the detorioration of food quality and internal hygiene the interest of the employees to use this cafeteria is declining. To make it worse, the service provided by the waiters is completely unsatisfactory. Due to these reasons, owner of the cafeteria is facing moneytary loss.
I would like to request you that instead of shutting down the cafeteria it might be renovated and staffs could be trained in a proper way to improve customer service. It will definitely attract employees to use it again. In addition to that an expert manager also be appointed here to supervise the overall activity of the cafe which will certainly attract the employees regarding changes.
I therefore, hope that you will take necessary actions to refurbish and reopen the cafeteria instead of closing it in consideration of employees.
Sincerely yours
Jakir Alam
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 123, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a proper way" with adverb for "proper"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...e renovated and staffs could be trained in a proper way to improve customer service. It will de...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, regarding, so, therefore, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.48453608247 120% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 4.92783505155 122% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 5.05154639175 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.03092783505 198% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 32.9175257732 61% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 26.3917525773 136% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.85567010309 130% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1107.0 937.175257732 118% => OK
No of words: 221.0 206.0 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00904977376 4.54256449028 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.78020617076 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90528747587 2.54303337028 114% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 127.690721649 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592760180995 0.622605031667 95% => OK
syllable_count: 356.4 290.88556701 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.13402061856 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 1.44329896907 139% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6804123711 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 16.3608247423 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.8866119346 44.8134815571 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.636363636 76.5299724578 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0909090909 16.8248392259 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.72727272727 4.34317383033 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 7.41237113402 121% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.49484536082 134% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.94845360825 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176875460518 0.216113520407 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.056362083424 0.0766984524023 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529944041115 0.0603063233224 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104163401842 0.12726935374 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254229169138 0.0580467560999 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 8.37731958763 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 70.7449484536 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 7.45979381443 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 8.71597938144 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 7.59969072165 117% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 41.2886597938 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 8.62886597938 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 8.54432989691 117% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 8.15463917526 147% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.