The given graph shows the changes in the emission of carbon dioxide per person in 4 European Countries in the period from 1967 to 2007.
The main feature of this graph is that Porugal and Italy experienced the increasing production of carbon dioxide, while United Kingdon and Sweden got the lowering carbon dioxide. However, it seen that and Portugal had been in the same rate at the end of the period.
The production of carbon dioxide in Portugal and Italy was steady escalating during that period. In 1967 emission of carbon dioxide in Portugal was more or less 1.8 metric tonnes and in 2007 the emission achieved approximately 5.8 metric tonnes. In Italy in the beginning of the period, it was a bit higher than 4. However, it increased to only 7.8 in 2007.
The emission of carbon dioxide in United Kingdom and Sweden was under decrease during the period of time. The emission of carbon dioxide in United Kingdom was the highest one among all these country labour. But after 1967, it gradually decreased to about 9 metric tonnes. The emission in Sweden was around 8.6 metric tonnes in the beginning. Then, it steady increased to 10,5 metric tonnes. However in 1977 it got tremendous decrease in the emission of carbon dioxide which underwent till 2007. In 2007, the emission in Sweden was at the same level with Portugal at around 5,4.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 91, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...nd Sweden was under decrease during the period of time. The emission of carbon dioxide in Unit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 263, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...it gradually decreased to about 9 metric tonnes. The emission in Sweden was aroun...
^^
Line 3, column 352, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'steadies'?
Suggestion: steadies
...etric tonnes in the beginning. Then, it steady increased to 10,5 metric tonnes. Howeve...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 392, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...steady increased to 10,5 metric tonnes. However in 1977 it got tremendous decrease in t...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 80, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...de can be connected with the changes in economical development and some new technologies w...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.48453608247 107% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 5.05154639175 99% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 32.9175257732 21% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 26.3917525773 174% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.85567010309 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 997.0 937.175257732 106% => OK
No of words: 203.0 206.0 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91133004926 4.54256449028 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.78020617076 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51954913351 2.54303337028 99% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 127.690721649 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.472906403941 0.622605031667 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 301.5 290.88556701 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.13402061856 44% => OK
Article: 7.0 0.824742268041 849% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6804123711 103% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 16.3608247423 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.7711863805 44.8134815571 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.6923076923 76.5299724578 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6153846154 16.8248392259 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.69230769231 4.34317383033 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 2.54639175258 196% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 7.41237113402 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.94845360825 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256552704652 0.216113520407 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10746429385 0.0766984524023 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680599352254 0.0603063233224 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177397274734 0.12726935374 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0647242289684 0.0580467560999 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 8.37731958763 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 70.7449484536 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 7.45979381443 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 8.71597938144 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 7.59969072165 98% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 41.2886597938 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 8.62886597938 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 8.54432989691 94% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 8.15463917526 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.