Most people take interviews to elect a person for job. What are the other ways? What do you think is the best way to recruiters new employees?
The most popular way of recruiting a person for the vacancy is through face to face interview. There are several other methods for selection but in my opinion in person interview gives the best idea about the person’s skills and capabilities.
An employer can appoint people through numerous ways. Firstly, an online test related to the job responsibilities can be beneficial to both employer as well as the employees as the time of employer is saved that is being used on interviewing all people applying for a single vacancy. Moreover, the employees can appear for the test as per ones own ease and also aids for people to apply who are living in different cities. Secondly, the other possible way is to select the fresher based on their academic results and their performance during college by enquiring of them from their respective institutes.
Lastly, some of the organization posses a policy named as internal transfer in which a person of same company can apply for the vacancy in other area. This method can be a good option as the management are already aware of the skills and capabilities of that person, all they need is to check their knowledge is relevant for that particular job responsibilities.
According to my opinion, the most ideal way for recruitment is to filter the people from all the available resume for the job and then taking personal interview from the selected lot. This is because, it reduce the amount of time wasted in interviewing under qualified people and interview in-person provide good insight about personality and attitude towards work.
In conclusion, personal interview is the most common and the ideal method for recruitment adopted by majority of the organization apart from online test and internal switch policy. In my view, employer needs some modifications in the early stage of recruiting to avoid wastage of time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 150, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...ties can be beneficial to both employer as well as the employees as the time of employer i...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 9, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...their respective institutes. Lastly, some of the organization posses a policy named as i...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 205, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'reduces'?
Suggestion: reduces
...m the selected lot. This is because, it reduce the amount of time wasted in interviewi...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, lastly, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, well, apart from, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.48453608247 200% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 4.92783505155 122% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 5.05154639175 198% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.03092783505 165% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 32.9175257732 46% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 26.3917525773 167% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.85567010309 182% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1573.0 937.175257732 168% => OK
No of words: 311.0 206.0 151% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0578778135 4.54256449028 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 3.78020617076 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86119796952 2.54303337028 113% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 127.690721649 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524115755627 0.622605031667 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 501.3 290.88556701 172% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.13402061856 33% => OK
Article: 6.0 0.824742268041 728% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6804123711 95% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 16.3608247423 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.6660958871 44.8134815571 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.083333333 76.5299724578 171% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9166666667 16.8248392259 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.25 4.34317383033 282% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.29896907216 116% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 2.54639175258 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 7.41237113402 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.49484536082 134% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313767999321 0.216113520407 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120690596069 0.0766984524023 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0764613346039 0.0603063233224 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187328386964 0.12726935374 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0792773997507 0.0580467560999 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 8.37731958763 184% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 70.7449484536 65% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 7.45979381443 174% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 8.71597938144 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 7.59969072165 118% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 41.2886597938 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 8.62886597938 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 8.54432989691 140% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.