Nowadays the way people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what way has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development.
There has been a drastic change in the means of communication between people due to advancement in technology. It has changed from gathering outside house to groups on social networking sites, however the changes has both benefits as well as drawback.
New evolution in technology has affected the interactions between people to great extent. Earlier, people used to meet on regular basis by planning get together in near place or by visiting relatives and friends place. Nowadays, this has converted into groups on social networking sites like WhatsApp and Facebook. For instance, different groups of family, friends and colleagues are prepared, so people only interact with each on this online groups rather than meeting in person.
As it is well said “ A coin has two sides”, likewise technology also has both positive as well as negative sides. Moving towards merits, improvement in telecommunications has removed the barrier between people who live far away in different countries. This means a person can contact another person living in different part of world by just clicking a button and is also able to see them through video calls. Moreover, the cost of calls has reduced as compared with past.
Talking about the demerits, people have become less social. In early days, people use to socialize more as there were no telephones as they need to meet people to keep up the relationship. The current scenario is that people communicate by either texting or calling whenever they feel the urge of being a social animal. In addition, it has isolated a person when they are in a group, where everyone is busy using their mobile phones rather than actually communicating with people.
To conclude, though the modern technology has improved the means of communication by reducing the cost and easily connecting with people around the nations, it has some detrimental effects on human life. Hence, it is the individual responsibility to limit their use of internet and do not lose their contact with real world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 232, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
..., however the changes has both benefits as well as drawback. New evolution in technolog...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 98, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...ewise technology also has both positive as well as negative sides. Moving towards merits, ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 83, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...come less social. In early days, people use to socialize more as there were no tele...
^^^
Line 7, column 105, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...arly days, people use to socialize more as there were no telephones as they need t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, hence, however, if, likewise, moreover, so, well, for instance, in addition, talking about, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1705.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13554216867 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78791867971 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599397590361 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2762297345 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.5625 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6875 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240899361023 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0773401707728 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512625055814 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123266117747 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034739185024 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.