Nowadays the way people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what way has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development.
Modern technology has vastly changed the way people connect with each other. This essay will suggest that technology makes distant relationships possible and this development is positive because it saves people a huge amount of times.
High-tech devices and online platforms will keep the relationships between couples and family members, who live separately in different countries, going. This is to say that the relationships between people will fade out when they do not communicate often, therefore, new technologies will allow individuals to stay connected with their loved ones more regularly and prevent relationships from being broken. For example, a survey by the University of Social Science in Ho Chi Minh City showed that 65% of exchanged students from Cambodia said they had strong distant relationships with their boyfriends and girlfriends at home thanks to daily communication on Facetime.
This is a highly positive development because technologies help people save a lot of time by removing the time required for traveling. In the past, people would have to travel from one place to another when they wanted to see someone in person. Now, people only have to take a few seconds to make video calls with the help of smartphones and they will see the faces of others just like in real life. For instance, instead of taking 5-hour flights from Vietnam to Korea, parents can see their children’s faces by using video calls on Skype or Facebook and this process only takes about three seconds.
In conclusion, today’s advanced technology brings people closer together regardless of any distance and keep their relationships strong while saving them a lot of time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 239, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'often' is usually put before the verb 'communicate'.
Suggestion: often communicate
...n people will fade out when they do not communicate often, therefore, new technologies will allow...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1426.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28148148148 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85243861208 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625925925926 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.5287313019 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.6 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279938849287 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127390920326 0.084324248473 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111533215025 0.0667982634062 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195874047727 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.14246649136 0.056905535591 250% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.