The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The charts give information on the causes on the degradation in the productivity of agricultural land globally and the percentage of land degradation in Europe, North America and Oceania. The study covers the data in the 1990s.
Overall, it can be seen that, the main reason of worldwide land degradation was over-gazing while least were caused by others. It is also clear that the most affected area was Europe with most of the degraded land came from deforestation.
In detail, more than a third of the overall causes of global land degradation was over-gazing at 35 %. This was closely followed by deforestation at 30 % and over-cultivation at 28 %. Other factors accounted the least of all reasons which was four times less than that with over-cultivation.
In terms of region, majority of the land hit by land degradation was in Europe at 23 %, of which, 9.8 % was accounted to deforestation. Roughly less than half this figure was recorded in Oceania at 13 % where the cause was over-gazing at 11.3 %. Meanwhile, North America had the least affected areas with 5 %, of which, 3.3 % was due to over-cultivation. By comparison the affected areas in Oceania was more than twice that of the regions in North America.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.48453608247 187% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 5.05154639175 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.03092783505 264% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 32.9175257732 24% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 26.3917525773 171% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.85567010309 311% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1016.0 937.175257732 108% => OK
No of words: 203.0 206.0 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00492610837 4.54256449028 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.78020617076 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11963316298 2.54303337028 123% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 127.690721649 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536945812808 0.622605031667 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 310.5 290.88556701 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.13402061856 33% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 1.44329896907 346% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6804123711 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 16.3608247423 110% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2566878311 44.8134815571 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.3636363636 76.5299724578 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4545454545 16.8248392259 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 4.34317383033 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 7.41237113402 13% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.49484536082 401% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119742630207 0.216113520407 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0564928167676 0.0766984524023 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0362877842765 0.0603063233224 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0921260365339 0.12726935374 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368874020747 0.0580467560999 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 8.37731958763 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 70.7449484536 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 3.82989690722 292% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 7.45979381443 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 8.71597938144 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 7.59969072165 105% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 41.2886597938 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 8.62886597938 104% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 8.54432989691 108% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.