According to some people, organizing things and keeping them in their right place both at home and in office is important. I agree with this opinion to a certain extent, but I also feel that there is no need to keep something that is used often in the correct place.
On the one hand, keeping our home and workplace neat and tidy will make us feel comfortable, because messy surroundings distress and distract people. Moreover, if things are not kept in their right place, we will have to waste a lot of time looking for them. For example, many people can recount at least one occasion when they had to spend hours searching for their keys. Had they kept the keys in their right place, they could have saved a lot of time and trouble. Likewise, if important financial and health documents are not kept in the right place, the consequences can be disastrous. In the event of a medical emergency, no one can waste time looking for an important report or prescription. Obviously, there are several benefits to keeping things organized.
On the other hand, not everything has to be kept right place at all times. Actually, when it comes to things we use frequently, keeping them in a place where we can find them easily is more important than keeping them in their proper place. For example, I enjoy reading. Once I have taken a book from my book shelf, I put it back only after have finished reading it. Until then I leave it on my table or in my bed. I find nothing wrong with this arrangement because as long as I can find the boo easily, I do not care whether it is in its right place or not.
To conclude, I believe that it is important to keep most things organized and in the correct place, because organization makes it easy to find them. However, certain things that we use often do not have to be in their right place at all times.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, likewise, look, moreover, so, then, as to, at least, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.48453608247 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 4.92783505155 183% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 5.05154639175 238% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.03092783505 231% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 48.0 32.9175257732 146% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 26.3917525773 152% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.85567010309 78% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1508.0 937.175257732 161% => OK
No of words: 339.0 206.0 165% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.44837758112 4.54256449028 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 3.78020617076 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44115578486 2.54303337028 96% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 127.690721649 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489675516224 0.622605031667 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 473.4 290.88556701 163% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.13402061856 88% => OK
Article: 1.0 0.824742268041 121% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.83505154639 327% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 1.44329896907 416% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6804123711 134% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 16.3608247423 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6629651062 44.8134815571 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.7058823529 76.5299724578 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9411764706 16.8248392259 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88235294118 4.34317383033 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 7.41237113402 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.49484536082 334% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217610094623 0.216113520407 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0716075958243 0.0766984524023 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638131340562 0.0603063233224 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157387892959 0.12726935374 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480557145769 0.0580467560999 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 8.37731958763 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 70.7449484536 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 7.45979381443 111% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.53 8.71597938144 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.95 7.59969072165 91% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 41.2886597938 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 8.62886597938 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 8.54432989691 112% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 8.15463917526 123% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.