The three pie charts show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts give an analysis of the expenditure of a UK based school in the years 1981, 1991 and 2001. From the given data, it can be seen that the school spent most of its annual budget on salaries. It is also seen that some avenues of expenditure such as furniture and equipment showed a fluctuating spending pattern, while spending on insurance showed a steady increase.
It can be seen that in all the three years, the school spent more than two-third of its budget on salaries of teaching and non-teaching staff. While the spending on teachers’ salaries was 40% in 1981, it rose to 50% in 1991. In 2001, teachers’ salaries accounted for 45% of the total expenditure of the school. On the other hand, the monetary allocation for resources fell from 15% in 1981 to 9% in 1991. The budgetary allocation for furniture and insurance showed an increase in (write: during) the period in review. The expenditure for insurance increased from 2% in 1981 to 8% in 2001. Meanwhile, the spending on furniture and equipment rose from 15% in 1981 to 23% in 2001; however, this sector showed a fall in investment of 5% in 1991.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, so, third, while, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.48453608247 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 4.92783505155 41% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 5.05154639175 99% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 32.9175257732 30% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 26.3917525773 148% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.85567010309 207% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 934.0 937.175257732 100% => OK
No of words: 199.0 206.0 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69346733668 4.54256449028 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.78020617076 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78044337871 2.54303337028 109% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 127.690721649 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497487437186 0.622605031667 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 268.2 290.88556701 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.41237113402 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.13402061856 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 0.824742268041 728% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6804123711 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 16.3608247423 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.3274639893 44.8134815571 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.4 76.5299724578 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9 16.8248392259 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9 4.34317383033 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.29896907216 47% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 7.41237113402 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.94845360825 152% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230695178747 0.216113520407 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0983782123256 0.0766984524023 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0619346140554 0.0603063233224 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198831917542 0.12726935374 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0329912675377 0.0580467560999 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 8.37731958763 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 70.7449484536 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 7.45979381443 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 8.71597938144 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 7.59969072165 98% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 41.2886597938 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 8.62886597938 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 8.54432989691 112% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.