TPO 27
The article illustrates that there are three possible causes of the little Ice age, which lasted from 1350-1900 C.E., while the lecturer disputes those ideas with several proofs.
According to the article, the Ice Age may cause by disruption of ocean currents, since the freshwater disrupt the Gulf Stream. In contrast, the professor in the lecture maintains that this reason is not convincing. He advances the theory by saying that, the Gulf Stream only appears in Europe and North America, however, the Little Ice Age also occurs in southern semisphere, such as New zeland and South Africa. Thus, the disruption of the ocean currents cannot explain the worldwide Little Ice Age.
In addition, the writer holds that it is the reason of volcanic eruption, because the dust and sulfur gas block the sunlight. However, the professor casts doubt on the opinion mentioned in the passage. He states that enough gas does block the sunlight, but when gases are strong enough, there should be other visible evidence. To be exact, if several volcanoes erupted, the color of the sunset would become colorful, and the snow will become gray or brown instead of being white. However, people in that time did not see big changes. So the theory is not strong enough.
Finally, it is depicted in the reading that substantial decreases in human populations may have contributed indirectly to the cooling of the climate, because more trees start growing. Nevertheless, the speaker refutes that even though the human's population had decreased, but it increased back very soon. Therefore, human cut more trees to support the growing population. As a result, the forest did not have a long time to grow up, so it cannot decrease the world temperature.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 240, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...he speaker refutes that even though the humans population had decreased, but it increa...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, while, in addition, in contrast, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.48453608247 120% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 4.92783505155 142% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 5.05154639175 139% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.03092783505 330% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 16.0 32.9175257732 49% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 26.3917525773 106% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.85567010309 182% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1455.0 937.175257732 155% => OK
No of words: 287.0 206.0 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06968641115 4.54256449028 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 3.78020617076 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53193853957 2.54303337028 100% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 127.690721649 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627177700348 0.622605031667 101% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 290.88556701 152% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.13402061856 33% => OK
Article: 11.0 0.824742268041 1334% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 1.83505154639 327% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.463917525773 647% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 1.44329896907 346% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6804123711 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 16.3608247423 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.84470799 44.8134815571 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0 76.5299724578 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1333333333 16.8248392259 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 4.34317383033 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 7.41237113402 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.49484536082 468% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.216113520407 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0766984524023 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0603063233224 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.12726935374 0% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0580467560999 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 8.37731958763 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 70.7449484536 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 7.45979381443 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 8.71597938144 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 7.59969072165 116% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 41.2886597938 186% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 8.62886597938 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 8.54432989691 112% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 8.15463917526 123% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.