Dear Sir/ Madam,
I am writing to report few discrepancies that I have seen on my credit card statement for last month. I am exceedingly depressed seeing these uncertain vagaries.
My name is Robin Smith, living in North York near the Castlemore branch of Nova Scotia Bank, which is handled by you. My account number is 19993535. I maintain one chequing and one saving account in your bank.
To begin with, I received my last month’s transaction this morning, which covers all my expenditures and withdrawals from the beginning of the month, till the end. While looking at the report, I found out some unauthorize payments that I am not even aware of. However, I can only remember of using my card for last time at a Grocery store close to my apartment on 25th June around 7:30 pm, since then I haven’t used it for anything. Furthermore, location of the unknown transaction shows in Calgary which is 34 Hours drive from Ontario and on top of it the transaction timing was 5:00 pm on the same day, which is practically impossible.
I would really appreciate if you could investigate this matter. Although, it is crystal clear that it could be some system glitch or statement printing issue, yet it needs to be double checked, so that it could be prevented from happening again. Also, kindly send me revised statement at my listed address on my account.
I look forward to hearing back from you.
Yours Faithfully
Robin Smith
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, look, really, so, then, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.48453608247 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 4.92783505155 101% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 5.05154639175 99% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.03092783505 264% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 39.0 32.9175257732 118% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 26.3917525773 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.85567010309 207% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1189.0 937.175257732 127% => OK
No of words: 249.0 206.0 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77510040161 4.54256449028 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.78020617076 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69253073867 2.54303337028 106% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 127.690721649 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.622605031667 107% => OK
syllable_count: 348.3 290.88556701 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.13402061856 131% => OK
Article: 0.0 0.824742268041 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.83505154639 218% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6804123711 110% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 16.3608247423 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.7017313078 44.8134815571 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.9285714286 76.5299724578 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7857142857 16.8248392259 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 4.34317383033 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.29896907216 116% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 7.41237113402 94% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.94845360825 152% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164811771185 0.216113520407 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0591493775679 0.0766984524023 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512027330785 0.0603063233224 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108855181424 0.12726935374 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0491916636234 0.0580467560999 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 8.37731958763 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 70.7449484536 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 7.45979381443 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 8.71597938144 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 7.59969072165 106% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 41.2886597938 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 8.62886597938 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 8.54432989691 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 8.15463917526 123% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.4606741573 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.25 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.