Dear Sir / Madam,
I am writing in connection with the recent experience my company employees had at your esteemed hotel, The Ritz, on 25 February 2020. The booking was for a 12-seater conference room for 6 hours, inclusive of lunch. The overall services of your hotel were appreciable, but, the lunch buffet was not up to the mark.
At first, on arrival, my team was given exceptional guidance by your reception team to ensure we reach the correct room. The room was perfectly lit and had proper ventilation along with comfortable ergonometric chairs. As soon as the meeting was over, your support staff escalated everyone to the dining area where the buffet spread was displayed.
While the team members started moving around the buffet spread, they found that there were only a few vegetarian options available whereas it was informed at the time of booking that 50% of the staff are vegetarian. In addition to this, some of the starters did not taste fresh and were cold. These, however, were immediately rectified by the Supervisor with fresh ones.
I would like to request you to make sure that such an occurrence does not happen again and that you ensure your food quality is improved.
I hope my feedback would be taken into consideration and I would not expect similar complaints in the future.
Yours faithfully,
Priya Malhotra
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 238, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ff are vegetarian. In addition to this, some of the starters did not taste fresh and were c...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, whereas, while, as for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.48453608247 187% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 4.92783505155 61% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 5.05154639175 79% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.03092783505 165% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 32.9175257732 70% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 26.3917525773 106% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.85567010309 233% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1130.0 937.175257732 121% => OK
No of words: 227.0 206.0 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97797356828 4.54256449028 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.78020617076 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62103149431 2.54303337028 103% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 127.690721649 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665198237885 0.622605031667 107% => OK
syllable_count: 338.4 290.88556701 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.13402061856 77% => OK
Article: 5.0 0.824742268041 606% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6804123711 95% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 16.3608247423 110% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2536878564 44.8134815571 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.1666666667 76.5299724578 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9166666667 16.8248392259 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 4.34317383033 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.29896907216 116% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 7.41237113402 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257931687658 0.216113520407 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0783633576693 0.0766984524023 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505477355887 0.0603063233224 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116616563817 0.12726935374 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0795025612667 0.0580467560999 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 8.37731958763 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 70.7449484536 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 7.45979381443 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 8.71597938144 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 7.59969072165 112% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 41.2886597938 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 8.62886597938 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 8.54432989691 108% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.