All parents want the best opportunity for their children. There are some people who think that schools should teach children skills, but others think having a range of subjects is better for children’s future. Discuss both sides.
Numerous arguments favour soft skills to be taught in school over theoretical subjects. There are both advantages and disadvantages to this approach.
Schools conventionally follow the theoretical method of teaching. Children are taught by professors who specialise in a particular subject and convey essential information via textbooks. This medium of instruction is frequently accompanied by practical representations in the form of lab work and field trips. Teaching a more voluminous range of subjects enable the students to gain knowledge of various other disciplines such as finance, environment, astronomy, language studies, and many others. Electives can be offered to cultivate the interest of children in a suitable field. The drawback of this approach is that it burdens the child with excessive information and children are then compelled to become rote learners.
The soft skills approach is effective for the child as he progresses through adolescence. It enhances and hones skills such as public speaking, formal communication, content writing, teamwork, leadership skills, and interpersonal skills. These skills are essential for a person to navigate through the corporate world effortlessly and harmoniously. The disadvantage of possessing only soft skills is that it lacks a sturdy foundation of knowledge and wisdom.
The school’s curriculum needs to be balanced adequately. Emphasis should be given to both theoretical and practical skills. The grasping capability of a child is at its highest in the teenage period, important skills such as critical thinking and ethics should be incorporated in the course structure. Subjects such as science and commerce should be periodically updated with the latest data and explained with enthusiasm.
In conclusion, no educational institute should focus only on one method and an integrated approach towards studies should be contemplated for the development of the younger generation.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, then, thus, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1688.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.84083044983 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26775895442 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595155709343 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.2183820316 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2941176471 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.23529411765 7.06120827912 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195116940081 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0555560696349 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0325092507565 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0889266125668 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414228703876 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.3 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.16 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.