Being a celebrity- such as a famous film star or sports personality- brings problems as well as benefits.
Do you think that being a celebrity brings more benefits or more problems?
Recently, the worth of roads and railways spark a lot of controversy issue among the expert city-designers. This essay will put forth some partial advantages to describe my affirmative opinion with extending railways.
Although roads have their merits, railways have more proprieties for countries. The more progressed country people live in, the more widespread railways they need. On the grounds following reasons:
First and foremost reason is having allover and stated of the art railways show that country is advanced. that means governments could afford railways. Duo to the fact that load transportations are safer and more convenience than the other ways. Secondly, cost of roads constructions have been about two time than railways. Besides not only do railways transport burdens safer, but also they make transportation much more convenient. Furthermore, a few persons with a train could move over plenty of heavily burdens, but that loads are impossible for transporting or that need tight security because of their hazards and the other limited. Thirdly trains make less contaminants fumes than cars and trucks, so roads could be more detrimental to environments and that is not acceptable for environmentalists. Fourthly, exhaustions are more in roads than railways, because of asphalt feature in facing with wide range of temperature, but rails are more persistent.
On the other hand, roads could be more contributing in some mountainous district, because the trains slip if the slope be more than a certain amount. Thus, that is impossible for designers to make it constructed.
In conclusion, in my opinion, at any country people need both of the ways collateral, because of their defects which could have been completed by each other. but strengthened railway could be more effective for approaching to expanded economy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ive opinion with extending railways. Although roads have their merits, railwa...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d. On the grounds following reasons: First and foremost reason is having allo...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 107, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: That
...railways show that country is advanced. that means governments could afford railways...
^^^^
Line 9, column 661, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun contaminants is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... the other limited. Thirdly trains make less contaminants fumes than cars and trucks...
^^^^
Line 9, column 918, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...alt feature in facing with wide range of temperature, but rails are more persiste...
^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ture, but rails are more persistent. On the other hand, roads could be more c...
^^^^^
Line 15, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or designers to make it constructed. In conclusion, in my opinion, at any cou...
^^^^^
Line 17, column 159, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...ould have been completed by each other. but strengthened railway could be more effe...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, thus, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1579.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48263888889 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03065731765 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597222222222 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.74122717 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6875 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8125 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136120276487 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0498020214722 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545680689734 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0845416991003 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0502933281269 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.