The best way to resolve international environmental problems is to raise the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Environmental pollution is now the international problem that the world must carefully consider about. Some people argue that the best way to resolve this problem is raising fuel’s cost. However, I believe that there are some better ways to completely resolve the international environmental problems.
It is undeniable that raising the cost of fuel has some superb benefits to the world’s environment. Firstly, this task will lead to a decrease in the number of private vehicles, that means exhaust emission will be reduced. As a result, it will slow down the global warming process. Secondly, there may be a less dependence on fossil fuel so that humans can avoid the depletion in natural resources. However, increasing fuel’s cost is a difficult task, especially with developing countries because of their less advanced economies, then as a consequence, the task will lead to a high financial burden on people’s shoulders.
Instead of increasing the expenditure of fuel, there are some more effective solutions to resolve the environmental problems. First of all, planting more forests seems to be the easiest way to develop all over the world because green trees will create a much clearer and purer atmosphere for humans. In addition, the governments should carry out more restrictive regulations on environmental protection in order to enhance people’s consciousnesses such as imposing taxes on waste productions or personal vehicles. Putting environmentally friendly vehicles into practice is also an exceptional way to reduce air pollution in big cities, especially in the world’s economical centers, for example in Paris or New York. I believe that those solutions will lead to a significant improvement in the international environmental protection as well as raising people’s awareness about the important of the task.
In conclusion, I assert that there are a lot of ways to resolve the world’s environmental problems, and raising the cost of fuel is not the best way to do that task.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 172, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...el is not the best way to do that task.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1728.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45110410095 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29469255844 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545741324921 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6795463429 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.428571429 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6428571429 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 7.06120827912 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289192654369 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12230911348 0.084324248473 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120241877084 0.0667982634062 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249175046165 0.151304729494 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.136973909188 0.056905535591 241% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.