The best way to solve the world's environmental problem is to increase the cost of fuel. Do you agree or disagree and give your own opinion?
In response to the current environmental crisis, some argue that increasing the fuel price may be the best solution. In my opinion, this approach could backfire on our efforts to save the environment and exacerbate the volatile socio-economic situation in some regions of the world.
Increasing the cost of fuel could adversely impact the environment in the long-term. This is more likely to cause economic stagnation worldwide due to the ever-increasing cost of transportation, making the cost of food to rise and the poor more destitute. It is in this precarious context, the poor may be forced to monetize on nature as a last resort. For example, they may excessively exploit the forest resources and illegally poach wild animals, eventually leading to the loss of biodiversity as well as to a more exacerbated environmental crisis. Furthermore, economic stagnation as a result of the higher fuel price undermines the prospect of developing an alternative, environmentally-friendly energy in the future. Economic growth stagnated means almost no large investment capital poured into such projects.
Any intervention in the cost of fuel could destabilize the current socio-economic situation of the oil states. This move is more likely to retard the social process in the countries owning the large oil reserves and foster the centralization of power in a few hands, usually the rulers. The governments in the Gulf, for example, could capitalize on the increase of fuel prices to boost their oil revenues, which can be used to restrict the free press and suppress the liberal democracy. Furthermore, as the oil prices soar, the oil states may depend more heavily on oil mines, eventually causing economic stagnation. This is strikingly evident in the fact that oil export is prioritized over domestic manufacturing. Consequently, these economies are rife with government-financed businesses operating less effective and lack of companies that are more competitive, creative, and productive.
In conclusion, I do believe that increasing fuel prices could simultaneously harm the environment in the long-term and sway the balance of the current socio-economic situation in certain regions.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, if, may, so, well, as to, for example, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1863.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49557522124 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.45042723303 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542772861357 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 591.3 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8022875176 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.2 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.93333333333 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145209408725 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0523058025952 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495790356012 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0999987915589 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034416930558 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.