Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past thirty years that many cities in the world are now 'one big traffic jam'.
How true do you think this statement is? What measures can governments take to discourage people from using their cars?
In the last thirty years, it is not uncommon that traffic congestion has become an issue for countless cities around the world due to the contribution of the growth of private cars. In my opinion, I totally agree with this view and believe that governments can put a stop to this by raising taxes and enhancing public transport.
There are two causes for the increase in car ownership. First of all, lack of reliable public transportation leads to the demand of owning a private car. It is believed that pick pocketing on public transports has been so critical that people would try to avoid and indirectly encourage people to buy cars. Moreover, with the help of financial institutions, there would be no trouble filling out the form of lending loans for buying a car. Thus, these two roots of issues contribute to an overwhelming number of cars filling up streets and eventually causing traffic congestion.
There are two measures to solve the issue. On top of that, allocating financial resources to improve public transports seems to be one of the most efficient remedies. In this regard, by installing cameras on public transports, people would feel safe using public transports since they would not be worried about issues like pick pocketing anymore. Another effective way is to raise the taxes on cars, so people would be discouraged from buying the vehicles and consequently public transports would be a valid alternative. For instance, in Spain, car taxes are so high that more than half of the daily commuters choose the train, bus, or subway rather than their cars.
To sum up, it is undeniable that a poor public transportation system and the easy access to cars have been creating a serious problem of traffic congestion. However, I believe that government can put a halt to this matter by applying higher taxes on private car owners and focusing on improving the public transportation system.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 580, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... eventually causing traffic congestion. There are two measures to solve the issu...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, moreover, so, thus, for instance, first of all, in my opinion, to sum up, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1590.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95327102804 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77484594067 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557632398754 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8218403054 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.571428571 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9285714286 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.78571428571 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184321941058 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704080773052 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0325501858066 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117629804131 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0106374340021 0.056905535591 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.