Parents are playing an important role for children and their duties is protected and leading them to adapt in this society. Some parent thinks that children should always given advice from them, but the others are more liked their child to learn from mistake. I believe that children should give them more freedom to achieve their own independent.
Parent as an adult that they have been through several of tasks from lives, also they obviously know the weakness about their children. They will do their best to prevent their love one to get involve any kind of risk, therefore, some parent are over commended their child for the reason of prevent from hurt. In addition, this kind of nurse style may cause their child are relied on their parent, they can’t make any decisions without them. As a result, they seem like a robot that followed the order without consideration, but they’re not.
On the other hand, children have no much advice from their parent are more creatively and motivation. Some parent that they tend to train their children to discover their own vision of world. Children gained their own experience from their mistakes and they know how to against the problems when they face it. Parent will only to assist them nor to give the command. So children can discover their potential talent in their own experience which lead them be more independence and able to face more challenge in the future.
In conclusion, we all wish our children get away from harm and strong enough to live in this world, but we also need to give them some space to creative their own dream. We should assist them to be person who has creativity skill not the person who only knows to follow the orders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 34, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...ot. On the other hand, children have no much advice from their parent are more ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, may, so, therefore, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 24.0651302605 199% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1424.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79461279461 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26749616212 2.80592935109 81% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535353535354 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.6164030019 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.714285714 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2142857143 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244768624967 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105283142669 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0365992670657 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162730837628 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453949356127 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 50.2224549098 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.