Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world.
Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
Due to globalisation, nations across the world have come close to each other. Concurrently, this has given rise to the trading of goods making products available in any part of the world for consumption. In my opinion, it is a positive development as it has promoted economic growth as well as it has made the price of supplies affordable.
To begin with, one of the major benefits behind the availability of goods globally is it has accelerated economic development. To explain it further, a trade agreement between the nations has caused movement of goods globally. This has created the international market of goods which are imported and exported on a large scale. Consequently, the financial flows have been augmented which have affected the balance of payments positively. For instance, the economy of China has bolstered its economic health through trade. According to the World Bank Report, China has experienced exponential growth over the past few decades evolving as the second-largest economy of the world.
Another advantage is the reduction in the cost of goods which can be afforded by even a middle-income group. To elaborate more, trading of items has propelled countries to manufacture goods by producing in the homeland. This measure has brought down the cost of production and thus has affected the overall price of goods. As a result, the products have become economical that even the middle-class could bear the cost. For example, according to a business report, the sales of international branded cars which are manufactured in India have escalated as it is easy to pocket as compared to imported cars.
In conclusion, the free flow of produces between nations over the globe has the potential not only to stimulate economic expansion but also to control the price-tag.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, second, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1519.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20205479452 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98916696745 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554794520548 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.4882274061 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.266666667 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4666666667 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0881283285443 0.244688304435 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0296617431003 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0362933336413 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0508097410149 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403531579923 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.