Countries should spend moneyn on trains rather than new roads. Do you agree or disagree?
It is often argued that authorities of the countries should financially supply the development of the train instead of contributing money to construct new roads. This essay agrees with that suggestion completely because of the benefits it brings to people and the environment. The essay will first discuss the advantages of using trains such as reduced travel time and then explain the benefits of environmentally-friendly trains in comparison with other means of transport which will increase with the number of roads and their improvement.
Preferring railways and subways instead of road transport people remove time constrains. This is because a well-organized system of railroads and/or subways avoids traffic jams and as a result, people save a significant amount of their own time. For example, in October 2019, Indian officials reported that Indian government invested in the railways due to reduce people's travel time through increasing the speed of the trains across the existing rail network.
The use of trains instead of road transport helps curtail environmental damage. In other words, the use of environmentally-friendly trains rather than fossil fuel transports, which create air pollution through emission of carbon dioxide and harm the environment, brings a positive contribution to the negative environmental impact of transport. As a result, it decreases global warming. For instance, recent research concluded that road transport is the largest contributor to global warming and scientists suggested reducing the individual vehicle's emission.
In conclusion, this essay supports the idea to use and improve commuter rail and subway trains instead of road development to reduce journey time and preserve the environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 542, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'vehicles'' or 'vehicle's'?
Suggestion: vehicles'; vehicle's
...tists suggested reducing the individual vehicles emission. In conclusion, this essay ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, then, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1491.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69083969466 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30195028832 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553435114504 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.3232934032 49.4020404114 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.545454545 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8181818182 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15117038613 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0590303867231 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463666048139 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0901678541567 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438475924143 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.02 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.