With the development of technology and science, some people believe that there is no great value of artists such as musicians and painters. What are the things artists can do but the scientist cannot? Why should we encourage the art area?
Since the development of the technology and science, a few people reckon that the values of musicians and painters are witnessing a reverse. The essay discuss about this matter.
Arts and science have many contrasts. Even more, there are numerous things that artists can do though, scientist cannot. Specially art is a thing that goes along will humans’ feelings, expressions. However, science is an area that find new inventions, notions to develop the whole world. Artists are the people who create happy feelings when someone in a bad situation. Even more, artists can create the creativity of people to interpret their hidden skills, artists can develop the intimacy between humans by creating positive minds, artists are the ones who change the thinking pattern of young kids and it might provide positive consequences. For instance, there are music, movies and arts that provide good habits and it might change their whole life in to a good direction. On the contrary, scientists cannot change the feeling, expressions and create a decent human being to the society.
In addition, if we ask from a young kid, what are they going to do in the future? Majority of kids might tell that they want to be a doctor, scientist or an engineer but no one will tell that they want to be an artist. So, it is indispensable to encourage the art. Owing to the fact that if we encourage art area, we can create a peaceful and creative society. Even more, people might care about each other as a positive consequence.
To sum up, consequently, due to the development of science, there is a negative impact on arts and its values. The area of art is an integral part of the society and it should encourage. I suggest that schools need to develop the art education to create artists in the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 588, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the ones who change the thinking pattern of young kids and it might provide posit...
^^
Line 4, column 278, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cation to create artists in the future.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, so, for instance, in addition, on the contrary, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1486.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80906148867 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62647229971 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527508090615 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.4039391602 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.5555555556 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1666666667 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94444444444 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370193038879 0.244688304435 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104766890815 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656355513334 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198106468531 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0388433690122 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.0946893788 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.