The divorce rate is increasing. What are the causes and effects?
Currently, the rise in the divorce rate is a topical issue as so many nations are seeing this pattern. From my perspective, there are two main causes and two key impacts, which I will outline now.
First of all, the main cause is probably the occurrence of inequality in the house. According to statistics, 50% of women in Vietnam still suffer from being assaulted by their spouse for not doing household chores and cooking. Moreover, others say that they lack freedom since they are forced to follow the rules of their husband. For example, if they want to go out with their friends, they have to ask for permission before leaving.
The other factor that brings about the situation is the deprivation of compassion in marriage. For instance, some couples seem not to agree on reaching decisions, or when they have quarrels, the other person does not feel the need to make an apology. Gradually, this leads to divorce, when individuals cannot stand having controversies every day.
Therefore, the effects of increased divorce rates can be quite devastating. For one thing, depression among children is inevitable. To witness their parents living apart, they would be lonely due to not feeling the love of them or being in a close-knit family. The other point I would like to mention is the adverse consequence on the economy of a nation. Some individuals, after divorcing, are afraid of establishing a romantic relationship again, so they remain single forever. Consequently, there would be more and more elderly people, resulting in a lack of a qualified workforce to contribute to economic development. If a country wants to boost production and compete with others, it must have a young labour force with excellent health and a brilliant mind to cope with the excessive workload.
In conclusion, the causes of this phenomenon are primarily to do with the lack of equality and empathy during marriage life; the effects involve the potential mental damage to the young generation and economic stagnation. Hence, it is recommended that policymakers should create ways to reserve the rights of women such as setting up a national hotline for them to contact if they are being abused. The other remedy is that before getting married, couples should be introduced to pre-marriage courses to acquire knowledge and prepare for a long-lasting relationship with their partner.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, first, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, first of all, for one thing
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1991.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 389.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11825192802 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80377297021 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60411311054 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 617.4 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1183153233 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.789473684 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4736842105 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.84210526316 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11282562078 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0395335678379 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0897480776072 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0625810749302 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0502130432473 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.