Environmental problems are too big for individual countries and individual people to address. We have reached the stage where the only way to protect the environment is to address it at an international level. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Nowadays, the level of damage of environmental problems has become more difficulty to solve than before which can not be solved individually by each country or people. I totally agree that the problems are global issues and governments should address them in cooperation with each other.
A variety of environmental problems exist on our planet such as global warming, the garbage patch at Pacific and how to save endangered species. Unfortunately, these problems influence not only a country but the world at the same time. For example, Global Warming, one of the famous environmental issues; it causes that the level of the ocean is rising and influencing many countries which located at different continents. These countries are losing their land. In order to solve this problem; governments need to limit the consumption of fuels. Under this circumstance, the International cooperation is necessary.
For the purpose of economic development, developing countries usually obtain natural resource through to exploit nature such tropical rainforests. In order to prevent(avoid) this development activity which is one of the factors of abnormal climate causes irremediable damages. I believe that the government of developed countries should provide appropriate assistance such as technology, equipment and organize the International team to help other countries address the environmental problems which are at an international level and understand the factors more deeper which slowly destroy our planet.
In conclusion, the problems have to address through the international cooperation but people should know that the responsibility of protecting the environment is not only governments or environmental group but everyone.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 555, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'deeper' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: deeper
...tional level and understand the factors more deeper which slowly destroy our planet. In ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1479.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.75486381323 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24722567075 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56420233463 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.3138231623 49.4020404114 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.25 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4166666667 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279695590319 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0951103670636 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703607756419 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182238498839 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0452802356956 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.07 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.