Even though globalization affects the world s economies in a very positive way its negative side should not be forgotten Present argumentation to highlight your opinion on this matter Give reasons and specific examples to support your opinion s Express yo

Essay topics:

Even though globalization affects the world's economies in a very positive way, its negative side should not be forgotten.
Present argumentation to highlight your opinion on this matter. Give reasons and specific examples to support your opinion(s).
Express your view in an essay of about 300-350 words.

Globalization has irrefutably enabled the exponential development of our global economy. However, it is also disputed that there are a number of adverse influences related with this conspicuous trend. I completely agree that despite the economic merits, the drawbacks of globalization should not be overlooked.

Globalization is indeed a golden opportunity for participating nations to facilitate the growth of their national economies. The first compelling reason is that this worldwide development has enabled free trade and numerous international transactions. Each nation, consequently, can witness an increase h in fiscal output as the profits gained from export will be diverted toward that country. These financial resources can be further allocated in other sectors such as logistics, banking and tourism which is conducive to a comprehensive economic development. Another merit from globalization is its ability to resolve unemployment and boost the work force’s productivity. If enterprises expand their businesses to other countries, they would be required to recruit sufficient human resources to perform works. At a same time, the related skills of local work force can be improved with the aid of training programs introduced by global enterprises. With the above-mentioned conditions, the growth of the world’s economies can be greatly advanced.

Nonetheless, globalization is often associated with environmental deterioration and cultural assimilation. Firstly, multinationals often prioritize generating profits instead of preserving the indigenous environment. To illustrate, these businesses are likely to exploit natural resources, especially in resource-rich countries, to gain materials for their production or clear forests to construct factories. This can be detrimental to an indigenous ecosystem and directly affect the lives of the locals who would have to suffer the consequences. Secondly, national identity is in risk of disappearing since globalization prompts people to conform to a universal standards. Many people begin to adapt their life to assimilate themselves with the modern world by using state-of-the art gadgets or follow current trends. If traditional features are neglected, they will gradually fade which ultimately lead to grave cultural loss.

In closing, although there are numerous economic merits offered by globalization, the downsides of this trend should not be neglected. It is urgent for each country to strike a balance between preserving its environment and culture as well was allowing internationalization.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 664, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'standard'?
Suggestion: standard
...rompts people to conform to a universal standards. Many people begin to adapt their life ...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, look, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, well, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2212.0 1615.20841683 137% => OK
No of words: 370.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.97837837838 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.46671114953 2.80592935109 124% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624324324324 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 695.7 506.74238477 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.2021550723 49.4020404114 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 110.6 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122572700756 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0369951997048 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0270505484546 0.0667982634062 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0777896799318 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0190802735157 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 50.2224549098 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.9 11.3001002004 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.4 12.4159519038 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.59 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 142.0 78.4519038076 181% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.