Research suggests that the majority of criminals who are sent to prison would commit crimes when set free? What are the reasons? What can be done to solve the problem?
Although prisons should reform criminals and prevent them from committing a crime again, in reality, a large number of wrongdoers reoffend after being released. This phenomenon can be attributed to the ex-offender’s failure to support his life and his poor reform. Nonetheless, a number of solutions such as facilitating rehabilitation and minimizing violent culture in prisons can be introduced to limit the convicts’ chances of committing crimes.
A difficult life after incarceration and an ineffective reform system are believed to be responsible for the reoffending of ex-convicts. After being set free, ex-offenders often struggle to secure a job since recruiters would single them out, believing that an employee with a criminal record and lack experiences can cause controversy as well as damage their reputation. Being out of job, ex-criminals suffer from indigence; out of desperation, they would commit wrongdoings to fulfill their needs like food or accommodation. Another rationale for reoffending is that criminals fail to be reformed due to the extreme measures to control them during imprisonment. Such measures, like stringent rules and violent methods used by jailers, may generate psychological problems and resentment among prisoners, creating a hostile environment that breeds intentional misconducts. The resulting trauma and an unstable mentality eventually increase the likelihood of defying the law after release.
However, a number of commendable solutions can be enacted to resolve this problem. The first possible way is to enable rehabilitation through engaging prisoners in vocational training. With these courses, they can learn personal skills and other specific job skills like communication or computer literacy and the qualifications earned from such courses can persuade recruiters about their competence, increasing their chances of being recruited. Another feasible method is to provide mental aid, for instance, in the form of therapy sessions. As prisoners struggle with inferiority and possible personality disorders from the hostile prison environment, such sessions can allow ex-convicts to cope with mental problems and build confidence. If they are instilled a sense of self-worth and that society do welcome them, ex-offenders will be incentivized to start a new life and contribute to their society.
In closing, due to the rejection of recruiters which causes financial difficulty and a hostile environment resulting from strict measures, many criminals fall into criminality. Introducing vocational training and mental help to convicts can minimize reoffending to a great extent.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 102, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...m committing a crime again, in reality, a large number of wrongdoers reoffend after being release...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 229, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'convict'.
Suggestion: convict
... vocational training and mental help to convicts can minimize reoffending to a great ext...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, nonetheless, so, still, well, for instance, such as, as well as, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2259.0 1615.20841683 140% => OK
No of words: 387.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.83720930233 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24012049773 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589147286822 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 693.9 506.74238477 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1301420492 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.882352941 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7647058824 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58823529412 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181656082739 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0594670988677 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0432312677329 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111124268116 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451470173102 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.89 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.4 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 139.0 78.4519038076 177% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.