Eventually, technology will solve the most important environmental problems the world faces today.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
To face the major environmental challenges, you would need to find it's culprits first. Surprisingly majority of the substances which act as environmental hazards are generated from the new and advanced technology which forms the core of many global industries, hence it seems a classic case where we cannot fight fire with fire, i.e cannot depend on tehchnology to preserve the environment when it is currently doing the opposite of protecting the environment.
Firstly, industries thrive on new technology ,grabbing the newest technology off the market even if it saved them only a single penny.Despite knowing the harmfull effects on the environment ,they simply know it would be a bad financial decision,as being eco-freindly won't be earning them the extra buck they would get if they went the other way.The classic example is the manufacturing of air conditioners, while no doubt there are certain units that do not release greenhouse gases but ironically the manufacturers market upon this feature and increase the commodity's price, hence the unconcerned customer relcutantly buy's the cheaper one that produces greenhouse gases ,a main culprit of global warming.
Although there are many industries going green and new startups focusing on the ambition of producing products that are not harmful to the environment, these ventures are not going to be able to balance off the damage of the new emerging market.Take for example Zomato, who implemented the technology in such an innovative method, creating a new market of food delivery, which soon caused new competitors to emerge such as Swiggy, UberEats.This whole new market created which relied on an app and vehicles which of course produce enough pollution to balance of almost every electric vehicle had reduced.
In conclusion, technology can become evergreen and many are trying to do so, but on the other hand new ideas and innovations emerge which focuses more on the result rather than the approach, and the decision is upto the people if they wish to utilize the new innovations or save the environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 390, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... tehchnology to preserve the environment when it is currently doing the opposite ...
^^
Line 2, column 45, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...tly, industries thrive on new technology ,grabbing the newest technology off the m...
^^
Line 2, column 134, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Despite
...en if it saved them only a single penny.Despite knowing the harmfull effects on the env...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 189, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... the harmfull effects on the environment ,they simply know it would be a bad finan...
^^
Line 2, column 244, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , as
...now it would be a bad financial decision,as being eco-freindly wont be earning them...
^^^
Line 2, column 345, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...ey would get if they went the other way.The classic example is the manufacturing of...
^^^
Line 2, column 670, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...eaper one that produces greenhouse gases ,a main culprit of global warming. Altho...
^^
Line 3, column 245, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Take
...f the damage of the new emerging market.Take for example Zomato, who implemented the...
^^^^
Line 3, column 440, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...tors to emerge such as Swiggy, UberEats.This whole new market created which relied o...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, if, so, while, for example, in conclusion, no doubt, of course, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1740.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22522522523 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93917451931 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606606606607 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 16.0721442886 31% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 66.0 20.2975951904 325% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 220.788224324 49.4020404114 447% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 348.0 106.682146367 326% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 66.6 20.7667163134 321% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 23.6 7.06120827912 334% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0910303758492 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0653789413187 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0354537513704 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0616998983831 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377496857487 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 36.5 13.0946893788 279% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -3.97 50.2224549098 -8% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 17.1 7.44779559118 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 30.2 11.3001002004 267% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.94 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.27 8.58950901804 131% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 9.78957915832 215% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 28.4 10.1190380762 281% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 21.0 10.7795591182 195% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.