Eventually, technology will solve the most important environmental problems the world faces today.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Technology is expanding more than ever before. Eventually it will reach a point where it can solve most of the human created problems like the environmental problems. I completely agree with this motion and below are the explanations for this.
First of all, it is quite clear that technology has made more improvements in the recent decade than collectively as a whole in the past century. Computers and artificial intelligence agents working on sophisticated algorithms are being deployed to solve more and more complex problems. Also, environmental problems these days are becoming so gigantic that it is impossible for a human mind to analyze all the facts and arrive at a solution. Hence, it seems a viable to option to put technology to use.
Furthermore, the current computational systems and the future ones too are being able to process past data, analyze the current one and arrive at very accurate future predictions. And as the technology will become more evolved than it is already, it will be able to solve billions of computations in fraction of seconds. In terms of environmental issues this speed can be put to good use, by feeding in huge amount of data results can be concluded about future problems and their solutions with precision.
Conclusively it might seem, at first, that the current technology is not capable enough of contributing in solving environmental problems in a meaningful way. However, gradually we will be able to harness more potential out of our computer systems and put them into productive use to come with solutions to convoluted problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 139, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a meaningful way" with adverb for "meaningful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...uting in solving environmental problems in a meaningful way. However, gradually we will be able to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 278, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...er systems and put them into productive use to come with solutions to convoluted pr...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, second, so, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1338.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12643678161 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00582954108 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567049808429 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2834148789 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.5 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164689381162 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681385597946 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561196733468 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115808993458 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406168404206 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.