Our global diaspora is broadly segregated into two halves, oriental and occidental. There are bound to be difference on social, economical, cultural and environment front as well. The issue of humans damaging the environment is of no exception and irrefutable. This essay is going to discuss some of the ways humans are damaging the earth and come to a reasonable conclusion.
In other to justify my viewpoint, constant cutting down of trees that are melt to supply humans with oxygen is been destroy for housing and road development. Thereby, making the earth hotter for people to live in. Not to mention the building of industries that released toxic to the atmosphere leading to one form of illness or the other.
Another pivotal aspect of my argument is the use of chemicals in our aquatic system. Furthermore, this chemicals are harmful to sea creatures, making it difficult for their survival. Research has shown that the use of chemical in our aquatic system has Eighty percent of killing our sea creatures.
Although, many people believed that humans are not damaging the environment, humans are doing what is right for our existence. I opine that this statement is false. To save our environment the federal and state government needs to implement a law that will regulate the use of chemicals in our aquatic system. Government can also make it mandatory for more trees to be planted in our streets. Besides, Government can increase tax for industries that are polluting the environment to help savage our environment.
To conclude, I would like to say although, humans are damaging the earth but, federal and state government can do more to bring this earth in shape. And we must be prudent to strike a balance, logical, and rational approach towards the same effort and fruitful utilization of resources.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 293, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...futable. This essay is going to discuss some of the ways humans are damaging the earth and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 117, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'destroyed'.
Suggestion: destroyed
...lt to supply humans with oxygen is been destroy for housing and road development. There...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 98, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...als in our aquatic system. Furthermore, this chemicals are harmful to sea creatures,...
^^^^
Line 5, column 78, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ough, humans are damaging the earth but, federal and state government can do more...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, if, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1518.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02649006623 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78715121953 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549668874172 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.2470995987 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.2941176471 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7647058824 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.64705882353 7.06120827912 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199169770253 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0599745665933 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0842005091247 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0997511617927 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0801939035037 0.056905535591 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.