In this fast-changing world, distance learning and working have become one of the most challengeable issues. Although I accepted the positive points of this trend, I believe negative effects are more significant.
Many workers and students tend to work and educate from home because they argue it is more efficient and beneficial. They think by implementing this method individuals can save up more time due to the diminishment in the distance that must be travelled. Hence, the more time saved, the more efficiently can be achieved. Furthermore, students and workers have more freedom in time planning. Take a worker having more tendency to study at nights as an example; he tends to accomplish his tasks whenever he wants because there is not any compulsory schedule.
Although learning and working from home can cause some positive development, I think the dire consequences are more considerable. Not only can distance activities cause desperation, but it also can compromise social communication and contact maintaining. Working in workplaces and studying in the educational atmosphere surge people’s inclination while by distance working people are more likely to exposure to mental problems due to reduced communication. Take a student having eager for school liveness as an example; by distance learning the friendly communication and learning desire will be lost, and he is enforced to online communication which is not recommended for children.
To sum up, for the reasons mentioned above, I think distance learning is not a potent option in exchange for face to face activities.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, so, while, i think, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1172.0 1615.20841683 73% => OK
No of words: 218.0 315.596192385 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37614678899 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09985867599 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 176.041082164 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591743119266 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 378.9 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5369961988 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.2 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178574549036 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0733807075101 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0333713041826 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107818010856 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0449865448479 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.