A few languages are increasingly spoken in different countries, while the usage of others is rapidly declining. Is this a positive or negative development?
In recent years, the ever-developing globalization has caused some languages to be used widely all over the world while others have been in the edge of disappearance. Although this development can be beneficial to societies, I argue that its drawbacks surpass the merits.
On the one hand, talking some specific languages can bring many benefits for international trading and the global economy. Firstly, the popularity of few languages could help commercial exchange easier. The main reason for this is that the decrease in lingo barriers would allow traders to communicate better with their partners. Secondly, if many nations used certain languages like English, it could make a significant contribution to the prospect of international economy. In fact, when a language is used popularly in the world, business owners can establish their companies in other countries, hence not only bring more profits for entrepreneurs but also local residents in the host country. As a result, the general economy of all nations would develop gradually.
On the other hand, I personally believe that other languages should be still gained attention. The most important reason behind is the deterioration of traditions. It is obvious that all nations’ cultures are illustrated through their own tongues. Therefore, it is difficult to discover as well as get deep-insight knowledge of their customs and cultural values without using their native languages. In addition, the domination of few dialects can reduce the rating success of students talking in other ones. The main reason is that schoolchildren would be not able to reach their highest potential learning performance when they have to learn in other languages, instead of their mother’s ones. It is likely that these students would achieve lower academic results than their counterparts.
In conclusion, although the domination of some languages can bring many advantages, the importance of others should be not neglected. In my opinion, the protection of native dialects should be encouraged.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1746.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50788643533 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06437610933 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577287066246 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6423121091 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.705882353 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6470588235 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8823529412 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154152384093 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0501865906439 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.043352226165 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0990680709206 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391660986153 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.