Food can be produced much more cheaply today because of improved fertilisers and better machinery. However, some of the methods used to do this may be dangerous to human health and may have negative effects on local communities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is irrefutable fact that healthy food is an essential part of life to survive on the earth. Because of improvement of machinery part and quality of fertilise, it is possible to get better food in terms of quality and cheapness. Along with positive views, there is negative effect of chemicals on health of every individual and it leads to dangerous disease. In my opinion, there are both pros and cons of this situation but the advantages are more than disadvantages.
Discussing the positive side, there are ample benefit of newly developed technology in food production. The foremost one is that farmers have a wide range of selection, in terms of seeding, use of pesticides and fertilisers. For example, before two decade farmer were using natural fertiliser which is made by natural bio-degradable things and recently they prefer to use fertiliser like NPK made by chemical which contain good amount of require vitamins like Urea, Iron. Furthermore, many mechanical and electrical device decreases human effort. Labour work is converted into machine work. Moreover, it is time saving method of agriculture. Machine can do work within less amount of time period as compared to human. Thus, human can focus on other important work. Additionally, genetic modification has becoming possible only because of new chemicals and technique developed by scientist. The quality of food has improved. For example, A nut protein has been added to soya bean to increase percentage of protein.
After viewing pons we can not neglect the darker side of it. Firstly, such technology has reduced the need of manpower and many people are now jobless. This have negative effect on communities. Secondly, genetic modification is unnatural which lead to bad effect on human body in long term of time period. Some methods are also dangerous for environment. Different type of fertilisers decrease growing capacity of the soil.
In conclusion, I pen down saying that as every garden has weeds, such development have their pros and cons. If human use unnatural product over limit which lead toward disaster. Thus, mankind should use new knowledge of technology in certain border.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 941, Rule ID: NUT_NOT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'not'?
Suggestion: not
...ty of food has improved. For example, A nut protein has been added to soya bean to ...
^^^
Line 2, column 1016, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...bean to increase percentage of protein. After viewing pons we can not neglect the dar...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 110, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...h development have their pros and cons. If human use unnatural product over limit ...
^^
Line 4, column 252, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wledge of technology in certain border.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1821.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20285714286 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8208682988 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605714285714 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 599.4 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.2601016404 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.875 106.682146367 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.5833333333 20.7667163134 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205643330944 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531245112818 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523659846886 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11481508601 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351186030431 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.