Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion
It has been proposed that higher entrance fees to sites of great cultural and historical importance should be applied on non-nationals. My firm conviction is that this will discourage overseas visitors from coming and thus, I have to largely disagree with the given statement.
The standard justification for the two-tier costing is that operating these sites chiefly relies on state funding, to which local residents already contribute by paying their taxes. However, I believe this is a short-sighted view. It should be acknowledged that foreign tourists also make great financial contributions, via their spendings on a wide range of products and services, including food, souvenirs and guided tours. Therefore, governments and inhabitants in every nation should gladly subsidise international visitors to their important landmarks.
The success of the tourism industry is inextricably linked to the number of visitors and their levels of satisfaction in their visits. If tourists realized that they would have to pay more to enter certain attractions in a nation, it is likely that they would stop paying a visit to the sites. To take an example, culturally important sites such as the temple of literature or remains of the imperial kingdom are the cornerstone of tourism in Vietnam. In these places, the same price is charged, regardless of nationality and this helps to ensure a stable number of foreign sight-seers. Should foreign tourists stop visiting due to uneven treatment, it could pose the problem of insufficient funding to maintain these significant constructions.
In conclusion, I take the view that it would be counterproductive to make international tourists pay higher admission fees than do locals.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 52, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d justification for the two-tier costing is that operating these sites chiefly re...
^^
Line 7, column 140, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y higher admission fees than do locals.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, thus, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1465.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46641791045 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15106362012 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60447761194 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3543624919 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.083333333 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58333333333 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232575522058 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0712905596555 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0299503069804 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129918752491 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0329651522385 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.