Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
It has been argued that overseas tourists should be charged higher entrance fees to sites that are of cultural and historical importance than do locals. My firm conviction is that this is unfair and may discourage tourists from coming to the host country; therefore, I have to disagree entirely with the given statement.
The standard justification for two-tier costing is that operating local attractions largely depends on state funding, to which local residents contribute by paying taxes. However, I believe this view is short-sighted. It should be acknowledged that foreign visitors also make a financial contribution to the economy of the destination as they spend money on a variety of products and services, ranging from food, souvenirs to guided tours. Therefore, governments in all nations should be happy to subsidise tourists, facilitating their visits to the famous landmarks.
I also reckon that if international visitors realised that they were overcharged, it is likely that they would stop coming to the area. To illustrate this point, the tourism industry in Vietnam relies on the number of foreign visitors and their levels of satisfaction in their visits to well-known places such as the one-pillar pagoda and the temple of literature. In these places, admission fees are the same, regardless of nationality. Should overseas tourists be disheartened because of unequal entrance costs, tourism revenue could suffer, which poses a problem to the maintenance of the aforementioned attractions.
In conclusion, I contend that it would be counterproductive to force international tourists to pay more for admission into places of historical and cultural values. Instead, every effort should be put into facilitating their visits.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, as to, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1485.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52044609665 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14996485305 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591078066914 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6100010989 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.75 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4166666667 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58333333333 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25281102965 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0732514129999 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.043722544471 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137259152445 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0181470307853 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.