Forests are the lungs of the earth. Destruction of the world‘s forests amounts of death of the world We currently know.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Forests are believed to be the substantial for earth and demolish them can pose negative consequences on current world. I personally agree with this notion and in following I will put force some reasons to support my idea.
First and foremost, the huge amount of oxygen have transmitted from carbon dioxide and it is taken place via trees. The CO2 Gas which is generated in extreme amount with human activities, through photosynthesis mechanism can convert to oxygen. Accordingly,If this crucial process had reduced, the surface of the earth and its creature would have been terribly different and ruined. Because O2 plays essential role in continuing life on the earth. For example, Amazon forest which is located in Africa, has been transmuting a half on the carbon dioxide of earth to oxygen. Az a result, spoiling this rigon can threat human beings.
The second reason for my position is about the role of forests in keeping the soil fertile for farming and other consumptions. Soil erosion which is prevalent phenomenon in the current world, due to extended deforestation is taken place in a specific area during rigorous precipitation will lost the surface layer which is nutritionized by beneficial minerals which is essential for farming and its products. Therefore, during years the soil of mentioned area will lose the ability of fertility of plants. Furthermore,the soil which is eroded can not be enriched easily.
To conclusion, considering above argument, not only the forests are lungs of the earth, but also they are vital for other creatures. Although people have not paid enough attention to forests, human life on the earth is depended on forests in remarkable deal.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 257, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , If
...anism can convert to oxygen. Accordingly,If this crucial process had reduced, the s...
^^^
Line 2, column 384, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ave been terribly different and ruined. Because O2 plays essential role in continuing l...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 507, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n forest which is located in Africa, has been transmuting a half on the carbon di...
^^
Line 3, column 292, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'lose'
Suggestion: lose
...area during rigorous precipitation will lost the surface layer which is nutritionize...
^^^^
Line 3, column 518, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...lity of fertility of plants. Furthermore,the soil which is eroded can not be enrich...
^^^^
Line 3, column 543, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts. Furthermore,the soil which is eroded can not be enriched easily. To conclus...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ended on forests in remarkable deal.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, furthermore, if, second, so, therefore, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1428.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19272727273 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82909558308 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589090909091 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.781970308 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6428571429 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173360799089 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0572495847601 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571433794041 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116822350409 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477408713599 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.