In some places, young people find it difficult to communicate with older people. Why is this? What are the solutions?
Young people are believed that have restricted interact with older people in recent communities. There are many cases for this subject and each of them are needed appropriate response from society. The objective of this essay is evaluate the reasons behind this issue and its possible solutions.
To begin with, people have been witness a profound gap between youngsters and aging people since technology had breakthrough in every field of science. Young people have been adapting with mentioned phenomenon easily due to flexibility and the high of their mind in learning, while older people have been lagging behind for their weak memory. The repercussion of this matter is that these two generation cannot find mutual interest. Moreover, even though young and aging people want to interact, they cannot have companionship with each other, because they have not similar hot spots. For instance, older people prefer spend their free time with family or in parks and libraries, while at morning young people are at universities or workplaces and at night they want to be solely or with their close friends at parties.
There are essential measures which should be taken to alleviate the consequences of big gap between two far generations which will be elaborated in following. Also, sociologists are believed that lack of interacting among generation will be posed unforeseen results on human's life, if suitable policies have not adopted. Although, advancing in technology has been fast and intensified this issue, amenities can be provided for youngsters to learn some practical modern gadgets to older people for persuading them to communicate with each other. Despite the facts that different generation have various interest, their hot spots can be closed to each other. For example, if government legislate some obligations for university students to work with aging people, the result is that their fellowship will be shaped inevitably.
In sum up, considering above argument, not only communicate with older people can be essential for young people for using adult's precious experiences, but also adults spirit can be boosted via these kinds of connections.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 270, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...ion will be posed unforeseen results on humans life, if suitable policies have not ado...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, while, for example, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1828.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34502923977 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72127199953 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56432748538 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3021949896 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.571428571 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4285714286 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301079506552 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114317345837 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0915033189334 0.0667982634062 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20462094234 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0652156333696 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.