In some places, young people find it difficult to communicate with older people. Why is this? What are the solutions?
To begin with, people have been witness a profound gap between youngsters and aging people since technology had breakthrough in every field of science. Young people have been adapting with mentioned phenomenon easily due to flexibility and the high of their mind in learning, while older people have been lagging behind for their weak memory. The repercussion of this matter is that these two generation cannot find mutual interest. Moreover, even though young and aging people want to interact, they cannot have companionship with each other, because they have not similar hotspots. For instance, older people prefer spend their free time with family or in parks and libraries, while at morning young people are at universities or workplaces and at night they want to be solely or with their close friends at parties.
There are essential measures which should be taken to alleviate the consequences of big gap between two far generations which will be elaborated in following. Also sociologists are believed that lack of interacting among generation will be posed unforeseen results on human's life, if suitable policies have not adopted. Although, advancing in technology has been fast and intensified this issue, amenities can be provided for youngsters to learn some practical modern gadgets to older people for persuading them to communicate with each other. Despite the facts that different generation have various interest, their hotspots can be closed to each other. For example, if government legislate some obligations for university students to work with aging people, the result is that their fellowship will be shaped inevitably. Also people
In sum up, considering above argument, not only communicate with older people can be essential for young people for using adult's precious experiences, but also adults spirit can be boosted via these kinds of connections.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 37, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'restricted'.
Suggestion: restricted
Young people are believed that have restrict interact with older people in nowadays ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 73, Rule ID: IN_NOWADAYS[1]
Message: nowadays is used without 'in'. Use simply: 'nowadays'.
Suggestion: nowadays
...ave restrict interact with older people in nowadays communities. There are many cases for t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 285, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...can be provided for youngsters to learn some of the practical modern gadgets to older peopl...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 194, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...t also adults spirit can be boosted via these kind of connections.
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 220, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... boosted via these kind of connections.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, while, for example, for instance, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1704.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37539432177 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7320578972 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555205047319 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4459240816 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.076923077 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3846153846 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53846153846 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310301399992 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123414581061 0.084324248473 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.088981229146 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207203346229 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0617068880584 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.