In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.
Why is this the case?
What can be done about this problem?
Even though Agricultural industries are reported to have progressed during recent years, there are in rising number of human who suffer from undernourishment in the world. In this essay I am going to elaborate the causes and possible solutions of this issue before arriving at conclusion.
While the current world have had development in Feile of farming and food technology, numerous human have not availability to food resources. There are many reasons which lead the society to deprivation of enough nourishment. First and foremost some countries are located in the arid region which they have not proper precipitation and soil. If climate are not proper, the region will be confronted drought. The result of this condition will trigger the people and country so they can not irrigating their crops. Moreover, when distribution of wealth are not fair in all over the world, most of the food storage and agricultural implement have been bought by wealthy country and people. In spite of United national organizations efforts and humanitarian helps, the apparent distinction between people in terms of food storage have not alleviated. Therefore, nowadays many countries are faced shortage of food.
This concerning issue can be addressed by various solution. Although many countries are suffered from lack of efficient water resources, they can use new method of irrigating which are used in advance countries for preventing of wasting water. For instance a mechanism which can watering based on a drop. Secondly, the government of mentioned region should adopted powerful policy for importing foods instead of exporting other surplus resources. For example a country which have a good handmade craft can export this industries instead of food and agriculture device.
In sum up, with considering above argument this problem is a prevalent in the word due to climate changes. Not only should people be aware of shortage of food, but also Useful polices should be adopted via government to reduce the consequences.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 33, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sion. While the current world have had development in Feile of farming and food...
^^
Line 2, column 491, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'irrigate'
Suggestion: irrigate
... the people and country so they can not irrigating their crops. Moreover, when distributio...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 513, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...h have a good handmade craft can export this industries instead of food and agricult...
^^^^
Line 4, column 11, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...food and agriculture device. In sum up, with considering above argument this pro...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1699.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.309375 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86463996156 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590625 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2610856448 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.9411764706 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8235294118 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47058823529 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209220035999 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0682332367755 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494758753149 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129076323694 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0112495467434 0.056905535591 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.